Prince Andrew Charged Taxpayers for Massages as Trade Envoy: Guardian
Key Takeaways
- ▶ Former civil servants told The Guardian that Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor charged taxpayers for massage expenses during his trade envoy role.
- ▶ A "culture of deference" in Whitehall allowed questionable expense claims to be approved without scrutiny, officials said.
- ▶ The Guardian report did not disclose specific amounts or identify which civil servants raised concerns about the expenses.
Former senior civil servants have reported that Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor charged British taxpayers for massage expenses and excessive travel costs during his tenure as the UK’s trade envoy, according to The Guardian.1
The former senior civil servants told The Guardian they were shocked upon seeing the expense claims submitted by Mountbatten-Windsor.1 The officials described a culture of deference within Whitehall toward the former prince that allowed questionable expenses to be approved without proper scrutiny.1
Expense Claims and Approval Process
The Guardian’s reporting indicates that massage costs were among the expenses charged to taxpayers during Mountbatten-Windsor’s time serving as trade envoy for the United Kingdom.1 Former civil servants characterized the travel expenses as excessive.1
According to the former officials who spoke to The Guardian, the deferential treatment Mountbatten-Windsor received within government bureaucracy meant that expense claims that would have faced scrutiny if submitted by other officials were “waved through” without challenge.1
The civil servants’ accounts to The Guardian suggest that standard approval processes applied to other government officials’ expenses were not applied equally to Mountbatten-Windsor’s claims.1 The culture of deference described by the former officials indicates that his status as a member of the royal family influenced how his expense submissions were reviewed within British government departments.1
Details Not Disclosed
The Guardian’s report does not specify the total amount of taxpayer money involved in the massage and travel expenses.1 The report also does not identify the specific civil servants who raised concerns about the claims or provide the time period during which the expenses were charged.1
The nature of the massage expenses—whether they were charged during official travel, the frequency of such claims, or the justification provided for them—was not detailed in The Guardian’s reporting.1 Similarly, what made the travel expenses “excessive” in the view of the former civil servants was not elaborated upon in the report.1
Mountbatten-Windsor served as the UK’s trade envoy, a position that involved promoting British business interests abroad and facilitating trade relationships.1 UK authorities have recently expanded their investigation into Mountbatten-Windsor’s conduct, including scrutiny of his activities during his time in public-facing roles.1
The Guardian report indicates that multiple former senior civil servants were aware of the expense claims and the deferential treatment that allowed them to proceed through approval channels.1
Jeffrey Epstein